Ex-CAF Disciplinary Chief Slams Sanctions over Morocco–Senegal AFCON Final

Raymond Hack, the former Chairman of the Confederation of African Football (CAF) Disciplinary Committee, has launched a scathing critique of the sanctions imposed over the incidents that marred the Africa Cup of Nations final between hosts Morocco and Senegal, describing the rulings as weak and damaging to the image of African football.

Hack, South African, placed primary responsibility for the chaos on Senegal head coach Pape Thiaw, insisting that CAF failed to properly address the root cause of the unrest that followed a controversial VAR decision during the final.

“I have reviewed the CAF Disciplinary Committee’s decision, and I must be frank: I feel they have let African football down with this ruling,” Hack said. “The entire incident stemmed from the conduct of the Senegalese coach. Everything that happened was triggered by this individual leading his players off the pitch and preventing them from continuing the match.”

CAF had sanctioned Senegal with a $300,000 fine and imposed a five-match suspension on Thiaw from official CAF competitions. However, Hack argued that the punishment was neither proportionate nor effective as a deterrent.

“Imposing a $300,000 fine along with a five-match suspension is, in my view, an incorrect decision,” he said. “When players step onto the pitch, they understand that the referee’s decision is final. Whether the referee is right, wrong or even biased, you are obliged to comply.”

According to Hack, the coach’s actions inflamed tensions on and off the pitch, provoking confrontations involving players from both teams and reactions from supporters — scenes he said should never be tolerated in elite competition.

He also criticised the match officials for failing to take firmer action during the incident, particularly against players who surrounded and confronted the referee during the VAR review.

“Red cards should have been shown,” Hack said. “The fact that these players received only two-match suspensions for bringing the game into disrepute is hardly significant. A player sent off or suspended for yellow cards normally misses two matches anyway.”

Hack warned that the decision could set a dangerous precedent for discipline in African football, especially given the status of coaches as role models.

“The coach is a figure everyone looks up to — especially children,” he noted. “Now people are asking: if this is how CAF handles such matters, what should we expect going forward?”

He further questioned the financial impact of the sanctions, pointing out that the fines pale in comparison to the prize money awarded at the tournament.

“When the winning team received $10 million, and the runner-up earned $4 million, a $300,000 fine becomes almost negligible,” Hack said. “Personally, I would have called for a suspension of no less than six months from all football-related activities.”

Hack also took issue with the fact that Thiaw remains eligible to participate in future competitions, including the World Cup, describing this as “completely inappropriate” and a signal that CAF is not firm enough in enforcing discipline.

“This sends the wrong message,” he said. “CAF has worked hard to improve its image, but the chairperson of the committee had the option to impose far heavier sanctions in order to restore confidence in the system.”

While stressing that he was not excusing the conduct of either team, Hack maintained that the disciplinary process fell short of what was required.

“I am not justifying the behaviour of the Moroccan or Senegalese players — what they did was entirely wrong,” he said. “But I firmly believe that stricter measures should have been taken against all parties involved.”

CAF is yet to respond publicly to Hack’s comments, which are likely to reignite debate over governance, accountability and disciplinary consistency within African football.

Join the Sports Village Square channel on WhatsApp: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vaz7mEIGk1FxU8YIXb0H