Zimbabwe Government Faces Backlash Over $70,000 Footbridge Project

The Zimbabwean government has come under heavy public criticism following the unveiling of a newly completed footbridge that officials say cost US$70,000 to construct. The structure, known as the Premier South Footbridge, was officially commissioned by the Minister of State for Manicaland Province, Misheck Mugadza. According to him, the bridge was built to improve safety […]

Zimbabwe Government Faces Backlash Over $70,000 Footbridge Project

The Zimbabwean government has come under heavy public criticism following the unveiling of a newly completed footbridge that officials say cost US$70,000 to construct.

The structure, known as the Premier South Footbridge, was officially commissioned by the Minister of State for Manicaland Province, Misheck Mugadza. According to him, the bridge was built to improve safety and accessibility for residents living close to an active mining area.

Government spokesperson Nick Mangwana shared photographs and project details on X (formerly Twitter), confirming that the footbridge cost US$70,000 and was part of broader development initiatives planned for Manicaland Province.

However, the announcement quickly triggered criticism from both community leaders and members of the public. During the commissioning ceremony, Senator Chief James Mutasa questioned whether footbridges alone could meet the real needs of the community. He argued that proper vehicle bridges were more essential to support transportation of goods, commercial activity, and heavy-duty use. He also cautioned that meaningful infrastructure development plays a major role in determining public confidence in elected officials.

Despite the growing scepticism, Minister Mugadza revealed that more footbridges are planned for Tsvingwe and Nyakukwarara, stating that these projects align with his belief that Manicaland remains “on a good development trajectory,” with several initiatives aimed at improving service delivery.

Meanwhile, many critics continue to question whether US$70,000 represents fair value for the size and quality of the bridge, as images circulating online have reignited debates over public spending, procurement processes, and government priorities.

What's Your Reaction?

like

dislike

love

funny

angry

sad

wow